1995 Report Index

NON-HODGKIN'S LYMPHOMA

Incidence and Mortality Summary
Male Female
Age-adjusted incidence rate per 100,000
# of new invasive cases
# of new in-situ cases
# of deaths
16.0
89
-
51
12.9
81
-
45

Total Cases by County
Ada
Adams
Bannock
Bear Lake
Benewah
Bingham
Blaine
Boise
Bonner
Bonneville
Boundary
Butte
Camas
Canyon
Caribou
28
0
8
1
0
7
5
0
5
11
4
1
0
23
1
Cassia
Clark
Clearwater
Custer
Elmore
Franklin
Fremont
Gem
Gooding
Idaho
Jefferson
Jerome
Kootenai
Latah
Lemhi
6
0
0
1
2
1
3
5
1
2
2
2
11
4
1
Lewis
Lincoln
Madison
Minidoka
Nez Perce
Oneida
Owyhee
Payette
Power
Shoshone
Teton
Twin Falls
Valley
Washington
Unknown
0
2
5
1
5
1
0
4
0
2
0
10
2
3
0


Risk and Associated Factors
Age Rates increase with age reaching the highest levels in the eight and ninth decades of life.
Gender Males have higher rates than females.
Race & SES* Generally in the United States incidence rates are slightly lower in African Americans. Rates are higher in upper income groups.
Other Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma develops with increased frequency in individuals infected with certain viruses, particularly the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), which causes acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS). Exposures to agricultural chemicals and high-dose radiation exposures have also been implicated.

Special Notes
Mean age-adjusted incidence rate across health districts:
95% confidence interval on the mean age-adjusted incidence rate:
Median age-adjusted incidence rate of health districts:
Range of age-adjusted incidence rate for health districts:
14.2
12.1 - 16.3
13.9
10.6 - 18.7

Idaho's highest rates in 1995 were observed in those over age 60. Females had rates that were some-what higher than males in some age groups. The peak of distribution is within the 75-84 age interval. Most of the health districts have age-adjusted incidence rates that do not differ significantly from Idaho's age-adjusted incidence rate.



Stage at Diagnosis
Stage at Diagnosis Graph


Age-specific Rates
Age-adjusted Rates by Health Districts

 

* Socio-economic Status