![]() |
|
ALL SITES
|
Incidence and Mortality Summary |
|||||
| Male | Female | Total | |||
| Age-adjusted incidence rate per 100,000 # of new invasive cases # of new in-situ cases # of deaths |
405.5 2,364 188 1,101 |
332.3 2,314 250 868 |
363.9 |
||
|
Total Cases by County |
|||||
| Ada Adams Bannock Bear Lake Benewah Bingham Blaine Boise Bonner Bonneville Boundary Butte Camas Canyon Caribou |
1,091 35 277 18 44 130 49 34 174 288 52 15 2 470 22 |
Cassia Clark Clearwater Custer Elmore Franklin Fremont Gem Gooding Idaho Jefferson Jerome Kootenai Latah Lemhi |
98 3 48 22 79 38 35 78 64 59 68 76 508 99 31 |
Lewis Lincoln Madison Minidoka Nez Perce Oneida Owyhee Payette Power Shoshone Teton Twin Falls Valley Washington Unknown |
32 11 60 77 204 9 23 96 26 99 8 284 36 46 |
| Age | Rates usually increase steadily with age. Most cases are adults in mid-life or older. |
| Gender | Males have a higher incidence than females for most cancer types. |
| Race & SES* | Rates are higher for African
Americans than for Caucasians and other ethnic groups. Rates are generally higher among lower income groups. |
| Occupation | Risk for cancer is greater with some kinds of workplace exposure, such as chemicals, asbestos, and radiation. |
| Diet | Diets that are low in fresh fruits and vegetables have been associated with increased incidence of several cancers. |
| Other | Tobacco use is the single most important risk factor for cancer incidence and mortality. |
| Mean age-adjusted incidence rate across
health districts: 95% confidence interval on the mean age-adjusted incidence rate: Median age-adjusted incidence rate of health districts: Range of age-adjusted incidence rate for health districts: SEER rate (1991-1995) |
353.2 |
The incidence rates for all cancers combined
were similar for males and females in Idaho until approximately age 60-64, after
which rates for males rose dramatically. The highest rates for both males and
females were observed in age groups after age 70, peaking in the age group 70-74
for males and 80-84 for females. Health Districts 1 and 4 had statistically
significantly more cases of cancer than expected based upon rates for the remainder
of Idaho (p<0.01), and Health District 3 had statistically significantly fewer
cases than expected (p<0.01).